The Four Spent the Day Together by author Chris Kraus β A Cult Writer Explores New Ground
The Four Spent the Day Together is populated with individuals seeking clean slates, trying to break free from addictions or toxic relationships, only to find hope curdling into aggression. Kraus often employs the phrase "new beginning", rendering it intentionally weary through its repetitions. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" recur in the narrative. And yet, she is embarking on her own fresh start, since this appears a novel form of writing β observational, genuinely novelistic. However it turns out to be laden with the same dilemmas and aesthetics as earlier books.
From Accidental Writer to Iconic Work
The writer was originally an visual artist who transitioned to writing unintentionally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, which was composed of letters to an unreceptive lover, transforming intimate women's literature from self-debasement into rebellion. She persisted as a writer, but the following three fascinating and rebarbative novels missed the power and directness that the letter form infused into the narrative voice of I Love Dick. This was not aided by was her identity as a nonconformist creator who had become a large-scale low-rent landlord, so there was considerable focus on real estate deals. It follows that she presently aims to experiment with different types of content, looking outwards to external narratives, at a time when she claims that Trumpian politics renders personal narrative obsolete.
Multiple Generations, One Unescapable Past
The Four Spent the Day Together is organized into a trio of segments, spanning three generations β none able to break free from their backgrounds. There is the narrative about characters Emma and Jasper, representations of Kraus's parents, moving from the Bronx to a pastoral setting. Additionally the narrative of the author, in the guise of Catt Greene, confronting the late recognition of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction a man named Paul. The third thread involves the story of the murder of one lost young man by another in a locality largely deserted by forward-thinking policies only a brief drive from Catt's rural residence in the Minnesota countryside.
As a reader drawn to polished prose of the type the author herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the narrative style of the first section.
As someone who reads drawn to precise prose of the kind that Kraus herself tends to eschew, I was seduced by the storytelling approach of the initial part. It possesses a novel degree of detail that makes room for trivial aspects, like the pail that the protagonist as a child dislodges from ice at the start of the story, assisted by her adored dad. "Look, an ice toy!" she says; "a lovely toy", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms circulating in their speech like sweet treats". The author narrates Emma's narrative with curiosity and intimacy. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream β not precisely her dream."
Letdown and Fragmentation
I was bound to become frustrated when I wished this new voice could persist to the end. The author states here that she is annoyed by the pleasure those who appreciate polished prose have taken from I Love Dick; she's committed to disjunction, to the unpolished style she has in common with her idol writer Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her past books comes back in the central part. The protagonist is trying to renovate multiple decrepit residences in the city's most challenging districts while moving between two different states, unsuccessful in assisting Paul manage his alcohol use. She experiences powerlessness as Paul cycles through underfunded jobs as an addiction therapist in a world fueled by the anger and fear that drives a political win. There are several pages about the protagonist facing cancellation on a platform, her occupation changed from "writer" to "landlord" on the online encyclopedia. Kraus still seems to care a little too much about this. On one occasion she states that she's researching the homicide so that before exiting the region, "she may grasp something about an the nation that her Twitter detractors would be unable to grasp, would not even see".
The Homicide Account
So then we come to the actual killing β and the referenced day passed by the deceased with the killer and his associates. Kraus utilizes excellent raw material, and reconstructs step by step what transpired when the victim Brandon came to visit Brittney after meeting her on an app where she sold sex pictures. He was hoping for sex but appears congenially to have passed the day alongside her friends, mooching around having his vehicle repaired and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by Brittney's boyfriend a man named Micah β a individual with mental health challenges who has frequently been hospitalised for aggressive outbursts.
Fascination and Incompletion
The protagonist becomes fixated by the account, and I found myself captivated by the way that her twin drives towards responsible documentation and daring boundary-pushing clash in this segment. Yet I wished her to delve deeper into her personal fixations here. The most interesting character is the character Brittney, who comes alive partly through Catt seeing herself in her β a similarly gifted, tormented individual going off the rails in a difficult, overlooked locality. The author informs us that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in jail, but she fails to enact these dialogues. This entire part feels strangely incomplete, to the point that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par